I agree that the police would if possible go with a cheaper version if possible. The bean counters don't do the driving.
I don't know about other States but high pursuit chases have been stopped here in QLD. The public were put in more danger so going cheaper would make more sense..
Even when going for cheap brakes (because of accountants) the police pursue vehicles still have to meet specific braking and other standards. So even though accountants don’t do the driving, the vehicles still must meet police’s harsh braking standards
Interestingly the standard commodore brakes failed the police brake tests while the upgraded mondo callipers (and their bigger rotor?) passed. And these mondo callipers and rotors were cheaper than having Brembo 4 pot callipers fitted to the cheap police SS variants.
If the polices standards ain’t enough to realise that Brembos 4 pot callipers ain’t needed in police pursuit vehicles (where somewhat harsh driving and braking usage above normal road driving is involved) and that the mondo callipers installed for the Aussie police are sufficient, then I don’t know what to say..
What brake tests are you referring to then? It seems logical to me that a car with 355mm rotors and 4 pot calipers is going to stop quicker than a car with 298 rotors and 2 pot calipers.
All my experience is practical not theory. Fact, my ve ute"s braking was a lot better when fitted with brembo's. My vt clubsports braking was a lot better when fitted with vx gts brakes. My vh's braking was a lot better when fitted with r32 brakes on the front and further improved when fitted with the brakes off the vt. Not as good because no abs, working on that.
Around town the difference would be negligible because of the 60 k speed limit but once out on a winding road they come into there own.
I’m referring to any brake test a magazine would do. I can’t remember them ever specifying vehicle weight as tested (including fluids, drive and any passengers in the vehicle during the test) and the tyres on the vehicle.
Why is this important because on public roads braking is ultimately limited by tyres and ABS calibration. On a track, the rotors ability to reject heat and avoid brake fade for longer also comes into it.
As for upgrading front brakes (rear brakes improve things even less), the interesting thing is that many attribute improved feel to shorter braking distances. Improved feel shouldn’t be discounted as it’s an important attribute but I’ve yet to see any quantitive comparison that clarifies what the improvement in stopping distance actually is for a car having its brakes incrementally improved. Stuff like setting a vehicles base line for old clapped out brakes, then testing new pads on old rotors vs new pads & new rotors vs mondo calliper upgrade vs brembo upgrade would be great… And all this on the same car doing by doing multiple brake tests with cool down between (to test single stop distances) and multiple multiple brake tests (to determine fading resistance) at each configuration would remove the inherent variability, same weight, same tyres, same fuel load, same driver & passengers, that would be an eye opener…
But who would do such tests as there is really nothing in it for car magazines to sell… maybe a better pad compound for the masses?
Having said that, the brakes on my Motorsport are awesome but who knows how the ABS is calibrated as compared to the evoke … I’m suspect there is a tyre compound and footprint difference as well